Recently I had
to reflect on the meaning of leadership, responsibility, trust and confidence. I
was confronted with a moment that called on me to think seriously about how
much I attach importance to values and principle, and how prepared I am as a person
to accept something that I may feel is not properly thought through. And when
this impacts both the decision of others or other interested parties, how much
are you prepared to withdraw your specific interest for the benefit of a bigger
group. As I went through these thoughts, I was concerned about causing
unnecessary conflict. I tossed and turned, thinking how do I deal with a vexing
situation that I knew would not necessarily make everyone happy.
It is easier to
talk about what is the right thing to do than to always do it. Especially when
one thinks that it can cause conflict. But I had to tell myself all the time
that I needed to have the courage to confront. This is not the confrontation of
a person, but to confront the issues. As I thought of the best way that I could
approach the problem and communicate it, it became clear to me that I could
never live with myself for not speaking my truth. Regardless of how potentially
damaging it could mean in terms of how one is seen, I had to draw on every
strength I had to raise an issue that I felt could have worse consequences if
not addressed.
What did I
learn? Most importantly, I learnt that courage is something that draws from
another very important aspect that I sometimes take for granted: being
principled. It was my understanding of the importance of principle that allowed
me to have a voice that allowed for the expression of the courage needed to
resolve the issue that I was dealing with.
Secondly, that,
even if people may not always like what you say, there will be an ear if the issue
comes with clear reasoning, and explanation of the consequences if a particular
course of action is taken.
Thirdly, that
not every issue arises because people have a wrong intent. They may arise because
people make mistakes, overlook something or just do not have enough information.
Sometimes they underestimate the consequences. Thus, I learnt that I have more
courage to highlight an issue if I speak about the impacts on me rather than
worry about the reason why people may have done something. Otherwise I become
totally paralysed into inaction.
Fourthly, I learnt
that one must always accept that things will not be immediately accepted, and
therefore I had to be prepared for a negative response. And also that, if you
have the reasons for raising an issue, it allows for people to reflect and
review any course of action they have taken.
Lastly, I
learnt that one’s own record tends to have an impact especially where people
have prior knowledge. It is much easier for people to deal with you on an issue
if you do not have a track-record of raising frivolous issues than if you are
always seen nagging negatively. Related to this, if you have developed the
relationships of trust over time, people will always listen to what you say
even if they do not agree.
But I would not
have reached where I did if I did not, in the first instance, have the courage
to confront.